-1 (binding) There are a few issues found in RC2 testing, a few of them are to do with systemvmtemplate patching [1] which is a blocker. I suggest we continue testing this week and cut RC3 next week to give users/testers more time to test and report issues as 4.17 is a major release.
I found an issue with UI which appears to be a build issue, in the first RC2 pkgs for testing systemvmtemplate weren't included and in the next re-build the UI elements were not following right css which were fixed with the correct packaging builds (with no changes in the code). [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6371 Regards. ________________________________ From: Wei ZHOU <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 20:33 To: users <[email protected]> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC2 +1 (binding) Tested vm/volume lifecycles on ubuntu 20 and vmware 70u3 Tested IPv6 static routing Tested kubernetes cluster with k8s 1.24.0. (found a bug and fixed it by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6368, but I think it is not a blocker/critical issue for RC2) -Wei On Sun, 8 May 2022 at 05:53, Nicolas Vazquez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC2) with the following artefacts up > for testing and a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220507T2233 > Commit: 6a36c59d341fb76fc6f9c90762ba5ca924e8d048 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For testing purposes, I have uploaded convenience packages to: > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC2/ > > The system VM template can be downloaded from here if needed: > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17 > > The vote will be open until 11th May 2022. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > >
