Hi Chris,
I mean to recreate the system VMs by destroying them.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:38 PM vas...@gmx.de <vas...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Slavka,
>
> didn't tried to restart the SystemVMs. Reading through the docs i had the
> impression that "live-patching" would be enough for this....
> Anyway - I tried my luck with the console proxy.
>
> Which failed utterly. Not starting as it isn't finding any useable storage
> pool. - logs at the end of the mail.
>
> I tried deploying a VM using the same storage pool which worked
> wonderfully.
> There i noticed that all my custome storage-offerings are unuseable at the
> moment. They are not accepting any custome storage sizes anymore...
> Throwing failures "VM Creation failed. Volume size: -1GB is out of allowed
> tange. Max:3072 Min:1"...
> So this is also currently broken....
>
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,189 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5) Run
> VM work job: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for VM 83, job origin: 3445
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,191 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Execute VM work job:
> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart{"dcId":0,"userId":1,"accountId":1,"vmId":83,"handlerName":"VirtualMachineManagerImpl"}
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,192 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) orchestrating VM start for 'v-83-VM'
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineProfile$Param@b66cdd7d set to null
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,198 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} state
> transited from [Stopped] to [Starting] with event [StartRequested]. VM's
> original host: null, new host: null, host before state transition: null
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,198 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Successfully transitioned to start state for VM instance
> {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid: "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0",
> type="ConsoleProxy"} reservation id = 6641ccc0-bcef-4b1a-a1f7-8dd8000626ad
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,203 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts: null
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,206 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) VM start attempt #1
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,207 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: null
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,207 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1,
> pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: (1.00 GB)
> 1073741824
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,207 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,214 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: null
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,215 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,216 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have
> (at least one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,219 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid
> set: []
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,224 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,225 INFO [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Guest VM is requested with
> Custom[UEFI] Boot Type false
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,225 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Looking for hosts in dc: 1
> pod:1 cluster:1
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,227 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) FirstFitAllocator has 4 hosts to
> check for allocation: [Host {"id": "7", "name": "srv-5-comp.blabla.blub",
> "uuid": "8c753ce1-0253-49c9-9c7f-1f971a719ce6", "type"="Routing"}, Host
> {"id": "5", "name": "srv-4-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
> "134c625d-15ab-461a-a38d-36fb0b979b5d", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "6",
> "name": "srv-3-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
> "6858713b-7e17-46d8-854d-24a13f9c7001", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "1",
> "name": "srv-2-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
> "883f7f62-55f2-42f4-8242-16b6847c4204", "type"="Routing"}]
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,233 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found 4 hosts for allocation
> after prioritization: [Host {"id": "7", "name": "srv-5-comp.blabla.blub",
> "uuid": "8c753ce1-0253-49c9-9c7f-1f971a719ce6", "type"="Routing"}, Host
> {"id": "5", "name": "srv-4-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
> "134c625d-15ab-461a-a38d-36fb0b979b5d", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "6",
> "name": "srv-3-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
> "6858713b-7e17-46d8-854d-24a13f9c7001", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "1",
> "name": "srv-2-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
> "883f7f62-55f2-42f4-8242-16b6847c4204", "type"="Routing"}]
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,233 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Looking for speed=500Mhz,
> Ram=1024 MB
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,233 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 7, name:
> srv-5-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 8c753ce1-0253-49c9-9c7f-1f971a719ce6} is KVM
> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,235 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 7 has cpu capability
> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,235 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 7 has enough
> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 37100 , Requested CPU:
> 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (176.37 GB)
> 189373743104 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> available
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
> 7, used: 90100, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
> 7, used: (73.90 GB) 79352037376, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
> list: 7
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 5, name:
> srv-4-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 134c625d-15ab-461a-a38d-36fb0b979b5d} is KVM
> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,239 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 5 has cpu capability
> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,239 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 5 has enough
> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,240 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,240 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 116100 , Requested
> CPU: 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (233.77 GB)
> 251009040384 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> available
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
> 5, used: 11100, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
> 5, used: (16.50 GB) 17716740096, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
> list: 5
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 6, name:
> srv-3-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 6858713b-7e17-46d8-854d-24a13f9c7001} is KVM
> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,243 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 6 has cpu capability
> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,243 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 6 has enough
> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 84300 , Requested CPU:
> 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (190.02 GB)
> 204032835584 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> available
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
> 6, used: 42900, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
> 6, used: (60.25 GB) 64692944896, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
> list: 6
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 1, name:
> srv-2-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 883f7f62-55f2-42f4-8242-16b6847c4204} is KVM
> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,247 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 1 has cpu capability
> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,247 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 1 has enough
> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 79000 , Requested CPU:
> 500
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (214.02 GB)
> 229802639360 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
> available
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
> 1, used: 48200, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,249 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
> 1, used: (36.25 GB) 38923141120, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,249 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
> list: 1
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,249 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host Allocator returning 4
> suitable hosts
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,260 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} state
> transited from [Starting] to [Stopped] with event [OperationFailed]. VM's
> original host: null, new host: null, host before state transition: null
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,260 WARN [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Unable to orchestrate start VM instance {id: "83", name:
> "v-83-VM", uuid: "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0",
> type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable to create deployment, no usable volumes
> found for the VM: 83].
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to create
> deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83
> at
> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.findSuitablePoolsForVolumes(DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java:1569)
> at
> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.checkClustersforDestination(DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java:1217)
> at
> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.planDeployment(DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java:527)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1126)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5315)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor945.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5439)
> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:620)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:48)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:45)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:568)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,262 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Done executing VM work job:
> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart{"dcId":0,"userId":1,"accountId":1,"vmId":83,"handlerName":"VirtualMachineManagerImpl"}
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,263 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Complete async job-3539, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 0,
> result:
> rO0ABXNyAC9jb20uY2xvdWQudXRpbHMuZXhjZXB0aW9uLkNsb3VkUnVudGltZUV4Y2VwdGlvbgAAAABWTU9yAwABSQALY3NFcnJvckNvZGV4cgAaamF2YS5sYW5nLlJ1bnRpbWVFeGNlcHRpb26eXwZHCjSD5QIAAHhyABNqYXZhLmxhbmcuRXhjZXB0aW9u0P0fPho7HMQCAAB4cgATamF2YS5sYW5nLlRocm93YWJsZdXGNSc5d7jLAwAETAAFY2F1c2V0ABVMamF2YS9sYW5nL1Rocm93YWJsZTtMAA1kZXRhaWxNZXNzYWdldAASTGphdmEvbGFuZy9TdHJpbmc7WwAKc3RhY2tUcmFjZXQAHltMamF2YS9sYW5nL1N0YWNrVHJhY2VFbGVtZW50O0wAFHN1cHByZXNzZWRFeGNlcHRpb25zdAAQTGphdmEvdXRpbC9MaXN0O3hwcQB-AAh0ANRVbmFibGUgdG8gb3JjaGVzdHJhdGUgc3RhcnQgVk0gaW5zdGFuY2Uge2lkOiAiODMiLCBuYW1lOiAidi04My1WTSIsIHV1aWQ6ICJiMWQxZjljNi1lYWZlLTQ1MjctOTMzNS1lNjQ5YzY0NmFhYjAiLCB0eXBlPSJDb25zb2xlUHJveHkifSBkdWUgdG8gW1VuYWJsZSB0byBjcmVhdGUgZGVwbG95bWVudCwgbm8gdXNhYmxlIHZvbHVtZXMgZm91bmQgZm9yIHRoZSBWTTogODNdLnVyAB5bTGphdmEubGFuZy5TdGFja1RyYWNlRWxlbWVudDsCRio8PP0iOQIAAHhwAAAAE3NyABtqYXZhLmxhbmcuU3RhY2tUcmFjZUVsZW1lbnRhCcWaJjbdhQIACEIABmZvcm1hdEkACmxpbmVOdW1iZXJMAA9jbGFzc0xvYWRlck5hbWVxAH4ABUwADmRlY2xhcmluZ0NsYXNzcQB-AAVMAAhmaWxlTmFtZXEAfgAFTAAKbWV0aG9kTmFtZXEAfgAFTAAKbW9kdWxlTmFtZXEAfgAFTAANbW9kdWxlVmVyc2lvbnEAfgAFeHABAAAUx3QAA2FwcHQAJmNvbS5jbG91ZC52bS5WaXJ0dWFsTWFjaGluZU1hbmFnZXJJbXBsdAAeVmlydHVhbE1hY2hpbmVNYW5hZ2VySW1wbC5qYXZhdAAQb3JjaGVzdHJhdGVTdGFydHBwc3EAfgAMAP____9wdAAvamRrLmludGVybmFsLnJlZmxlY3QuR2VuZXJhdGVkTWV0aG9kQWNjZXNzb3I5NDVwdAAGaW52b2tlcHBzcQB-AAwCAAAAK3B0ADFqZGsuaW50ZXJuYWwucmVmbGVjdC5EZWxlZ2F0aW5nTWV0aG9kQWNjZXNzb3JJbXBsdAAhRGVsZWdhdGluZ01ldGhvZEFjY2Vzc29ySW1wbC5qYXZhcQB-ABR0AAlqYXZhLmJhc2V0AAcxMS4wLjE2c3EAfgAMAgAAAjZwdAAYamF2YS5sYW5nLnJlZmxlY3QuTWV0aG9kdAALTWV0aG9kLmphdmFxAH4AFHEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwBAAAAa3EAfgAOdAAiY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya0pvYkhhbmRsZXJQcm94eXQAGlZtV29ya0pvYkhhbmRsZXJQcm94eS5qYXZhdAAPaGFuZGxlVm1Xb3JrSm9icHBzcQB-AAwBAAAVP3EAfgAOcQB-AA9xAH4AEHEAfgAgcHBzcQB-AAwBAAAAZnEAfgAOdAAgY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya0pvYkRpc3BhdGNoZXJ0ABhWbVdvcmtKb2JEaXNwYXRjaGVyLmphdmF0AAZydW5Kb2JwcHNxAH4ADAEAAAJscQB-AA50AD9vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmNsb3Vkc3RhY2suZnJhbWV3b3JrLmpvYnMuaW1wbC5Bc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsJDV0ABhBc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsLmphdmF0AAxydW5JbkNvbnRleHRwcHNxAH4ADAEAAAAwcQB-AA50AD5vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmNsb3Vkc3RhY2subWFuYWdlZC5jb250ZXh0Lk1hbmFnZWRDb250ZXh0UnVubmFibGUkMXQAG01hbmFnZWRDb250ZXh0UnVubmFibGUuamF2YXQAA3J1bnBwc3EAfgAMAQAAADdxAH4ADnQAQm9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuaW1wbC5EZWZhdWx0TWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHQkMXQAGkRlZmF1bHRNYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dC5qYXZhdAAEY2FsbHBwc3EAfgAMAQAAAGZxAH4ADnQAQG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuaW1wbC5EZWZhdWx0TWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHRxAH4AMHQAD2NhbGxXaXRoQ29udGV4dHBwc3EAfgAMAQAAADRxAH4ADnEAfgAzcQB-ADB0AA5ydW5XaXRoQ29udGV4dHBwc3EAfgAMAQAAAC1xAH4ADnQAPG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuTWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHRSdW5uYWJsZXEAfgAscQB-AC1wcHNxAH4ADAEAAAI4cQB-AA5xAH4AJ3EAfgAocQB-AC1wcHNxAH4ADAIAAAIDcHQALmphdmEudXRpbC5jb25jdXJyZW50LkV4ZWN1dG9ycyRSdW5uYWJsZUFkYXB0ZXJ0AA5FeGVjdXRvcnMuamF2YXEAfgAxcQB-ABhxAH4AGXNxAH4ADAIAAAEIcHQAH2phdmEudXRpbC5jb25jdXJyZW50LkZ1dHVyZVRhc2t0AA9GdXR1cmVUYXNrLmphdmFxAH4ALXEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwCAAAEaHB0ACdqYXZhLnV0aWwuY29uY3VycmVudC5UaHJlYWRQb29sRXhlY3V0b3J0ABdUaHJlYWRQb29sRXhlY3V0b3IuamF2YXQACXJ1bldvcmtlcnEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwCAAACdHB0AC5qYXZhLnV0aWwuY29uY3VycmVudC5UaHJlYWRQb29sRXhlY3V0b3IkV29ya2VycQB-AEJxAH4ALXEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwCAAADPXB0ABBqYXZhLmxhbmcuVGhyZWFkdAALVGhyZWFkLmphdmFxAH4ALXEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcgAfamF2YS51dGlsLkNvbGxlY3Rpb25zJEVtcHR5TGlzdHq4F7Q8p57eAgAAeHB4AAAQmncIAAAAAAAAAAB4
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Publish async job-3539 complete on message bus
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Wake up jobs related to job-3539
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Update db status for job-3539
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,266 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
> (logid:ba10fec5) Wake up jobs joined with job-3539 and disjoin all subjobs
> created from job- 3539
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,276 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5) Done
> with run of VM work job: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for VM 83, job origin:
> 3445
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,276 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5) Done
> executing com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for job-3539
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,278 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5)
> Remove job-3539 from job monitoring
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,285 WARN [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) Unable to allocate console
> proxy standby capacity for zone [1] due to [Unable to orchestrate start VM
> instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable
> to create deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83].].
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to orchestrate
> start VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable
> to create deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83].
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5319)
> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor945.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
> at
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5439)
> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:620)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:48)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:45)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:568)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,287 DEBUG [c.c.a.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter]
> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) received console proxy alert
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,288 DEBUG [c.c.a.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter]
> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) Console proxy creation
> failure, zone: blabla
> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,289 WARN [c.c.a.AlertManagerImpl]
> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) alertType=[10]
> dataCenterId=[1] podId=[null] clusterId=[null] message=[Console proxy
> creation failure. zone: blabla, error details: Unable to orchestrate start
> VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable
> to create deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83].].
>
>
>
>
> Am Mo., 29. Aug. 2022 um 09:40 Uhr schrieb Slavka Peleva
> <slav...@storpool.com.invalid>:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Did you recreate the system VMs? In the 4.17 version, the `systemvm.iso`
>> is
>> deprecated. In its place, you should have the file on agents
>> `/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/agent.zip`.
>> Can you share the complete log if the system VMs are newly created after
>> the upgrade?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Slavka
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 2:16 PM vas...@gmx.de <vas...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > faceing some challanges again after upgradeing to 4.17.
>> > Did as explained in the docs.
>> >
>> > Afterwards I am now not able to migrate system VMs to different hosts.
>> > Getting the error
>> > "Exception during migrate: org.libvirt.LibvirtException: Cannot access
>> > storage file '/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso': No such
>> file
>> > or directory"
>> >
>> > Checked the exitstence of the file on the servers:
>> > Mangement-Server has a "systemvm.iso.bak"
>> > Hosts - no "systemvm.iso" at all present.
>> >
>> > Maybe someone has an idea on how to move on with this?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Chris
>> >
>>
>
