Thanks, Chris, for the information!
Are you using custom offerings for the system VMs? Can you share more info
if yes?
About the log, it's not the complete log from where the deployment started.
The deployment begins a bit earlier than what you shared. Can you search
the management log for `Sync job-3539 execution on object VmWorkJobQueue`
to get the `logid` for the volume creation (coloured in blue)? And if
possible, share the logs with the found log ID
Here is an example from my logs:
2022-08-29 17:07:49,114 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-a952a3dc) (logid:89157bb9) Sync job-60484 execution on
object VmWorkJobQueue.4904
2022-08-29 17:07:50,816 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
(Work-Job-Executor-5:ctx-56172581 job-60479/job-60484 ctx-a900986d)
(logid:95d750ae) Execute VM work job:
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart{"dcId":0,"userId":1,"accountId":1,"vmId":4904,"handlerName":"VirtualMachineManagerImpl"}
2022-08-29 17:07:50,817 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-5:ctx-56172581 job-60479/job-60484 ctx-a900986d)
(logid:95d750ae) orchestrating VM start for 'v-4904-VM'
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineProfile$Param@b66cdd7d set to null
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:29 PM vas...@gmx.de <vas...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Slavka,
>
> thats what i did after your suggestion / informatin and where the error
> occured.
> Deleted / Destroyed the consoleproxy and waited till recreation. Which
> didn't worked throwing the error i pasted above.
> Sorry for beeing so unspecific.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> Am Mo., 29. Aug. 2022 um 12:46 Uhr schrieb Slavka Peleva <
> slav...@storpool.com>:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I mean to recreate the system VMs by destroying them.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:38 PM vas...@gmx.de <vas...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Slavka,
>>>
>>> didn't tried to restart the SystemVMs. Reading through the docs i had
>>> the impression that "live-patching" would be enough for this....
>>> Anyway - I tried my luck with the console proxy.
>>>
>>> Which failed utterly. Not starting as it isn't finding any useable
>>> storage pool. - logs at the end of the mail.
>>>
>>> I tried deploying a VM using the same storage pool which worked
>>> wonderfully.
>>> There i noticed that all my custome storage-offerings are unuseable at
>>> the moment. They are not accepting any custome storage sizes anymore...
>>> Throwing failures "VM Creation failed. Volume size: -1GB is out of allowed
>>> tange. Max:3072 Min:1"...
>>> So this is also currently broken....
>>>
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,189 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5) Run
>>> VM work job: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for VM 83, job origin: 3445
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,191 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Execute VM work job:
>>> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart{"dcId":0,"userId":1,"accountId":1,"vmId":83,"handlerName":"VirtualMachineManagerImpl"}
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,192 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) orchestrating VM start for 'v-83-VM'
>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineProfile$Param@b66cdd7d set to null
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,198 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
>>> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} state
>>> transited from [Stopped] to [Starting] with event [StartRequested]. VM's
>>> original host: null, new host: null, host before state transition: null
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,198 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Successfully transitioned to start state for VM instance
>>> {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid: "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0",
>>> type="ConsoleProxy"} reservation id = 6641ccc0-bcef-4b1a-a1f7-8dd8000626ad
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,203 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Deploy avoids pods: null, clusters: null, hosts: null
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,206 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) VM start attempt #1
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,207 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: null
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,207 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1,
>>> pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: (1.00 GB)
>>> 1073741824
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,207 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,214 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: null
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,215 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,216 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have
>>> (at least one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,219 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid
>>> set: []
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,224 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,225 INFO [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Guest VM is requested with
>>> Custom[UEFI] Boot Type false
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,225 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Looking for hosts in dc: 1
>>> pod:1 cluster:1
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,227 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) FirstFitAllocator has 4 hosts to
>>> check for allocation: [Host {"id": "7", "name": "srv-5-comp.blabla.blub",
>>> "uuid": "8c753ce1-0253-49c9-9c7f-1f971a719ce6", "type"="Routing"}, Host
>>> {"id": "5", "name": "srv-4-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
>>> "134c625d-15ab-461a-a38d-36fb0b979b5d", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "6",
>>> "name": "srv-3-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
>>> "6858713b-7e17-46d8-854d-24a13f9c7001", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "1",
>>> "name": "srv-2-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
>>> "883f7f62-55f2-42f4-8242-16b6847c4204", "type"="Routing"}]
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,233 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found 4 hosts for allocation
>>> after prioritization: [Host {"id": "7", "name": "srv-5-comp.blabla.blub",
>>> "uuid": "8c753ce1-0253-49c9-9c7f-1f971a719ce6", "type"="Routing"}, Host
>>> {"id": "5", "name": "srv-4-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
>>> "134c625d-15ab-461a-a38d-36fb0b979b5d", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "6",
>>> "name": "srv-3-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
>>> "6858713b-7e17-46d8-854d-24a13f9c7001", "type"="Routing"}, Host {"id": "1",
>>> "name": "srv-2-comp.blabla.blub", "uuid":
>>> "883f7f62-55f2-42f4-8242-16b6847c4204", "type"="Routing"}]
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,233 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Looking for speed=500Mhz,
>>> Ram=1024 MB
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,233 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 7, name:
>>> srv-5-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 8c753ce1-0253-49c9-9c7f-1f971a719ce6} is KVM
>>> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,235 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 7 has cpu capability
>>> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,235 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 7 has enough
>>> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
>>> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
>>> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 37100 , Requested CPU:
>>> 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (176.37 GB)
>>> 189373743104 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>>> available
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>>> 7, used: 90100, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
>>> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>>> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>>> 7, used: (73.90 GB) 79352037376, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
>>> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
>>> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
>>> list: 7
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,237 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 5, name:
>>> srv-4-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 134c625d-15ab-461a-a38d-36fb0b979b5d} is KVM
>>> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,239 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 5 has cpu capability
>>> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,239 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 5 has enough
>>> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
>>> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,240 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
>>> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,240 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 116100 , Requested
>>> CPU: 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (233.77 GB)
>>> 251009040384 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>>> available
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>>> 5, used: 11100, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
>>> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>>> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>>> 5, used: (16.50 GB) 17716740096, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
>>> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
>>> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
>>> list: 5
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,241 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 6, name:
>>> srv-3-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 6858713b-7e17-46d8-854d-24a13f9c7001} is KVM
>>> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,243 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 6 has cpu capability
>>> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,243 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 6 has enough
>>> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
>>> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
>>> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 84300 , Requested CPU:
>>> 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (190.02 GB)
>>> 204032835584 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>>> available
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>>> 6, used: 42900, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
>>> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>>> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>>> 6, used: (60.25 GB) 64692944896, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
>>> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
>>> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
>>> list: 6
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,244 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host {id: 1, name:
>>> srv-2-comp.blabla.blub, uuid: 883f7f62-55f2-42f4-8242-16b6847c4204} is KVM
>>> hypervisor type, no max guest limit check needed
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,247 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host: 1 has cpu capability
>>> (cpu:48, speed:2650) to support requested CPU: 1 and requested speed: 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,247 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Checking if host: 1 has enough
>>> capacity for requested CPU: 500 and requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824 ,
>>> cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Hosts's actual total CPU: 127200
>>> and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 127200
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free CPU: 79000 , Requested CPU:
>>> 500
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Free RAM: (214.02 GB)
>>> 229802639360 , Requested RAM: (1.00 GB) 1073741824
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host has enough CPU and RAM
>>> available
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,248 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc CPU from host:
>>> 1, used: 48200, reserved: 0, actual total: 127200, total with
>>> overprovisioning: 127200; requested cpu:500,alloc_from_last_host?:false
>>> ,considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,249 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) STATS: Can alloc MEM from host:
>>> 1, used: (36.25 GB) 38923141120, reserved: (0 bytes) 0, total: (250.27 GB)
>>> 268725780480; requested mem: (1.00 GB) 1073741824, alloc_from_last_host?:
>>> false , considerReservedCapacity?: true
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,249 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Found a suitable host, adding to
>>> list: 1
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,249 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751
>>> FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:ba10fec5) Host Allocator returning 4
>>> suitable hosts
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,260 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
>>> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} state
>>> transited from [Starting] to [Stopped] with event [OperationFailed]. VM's
>>> original host: null, new host: null, host before state transition: null
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,260 WARN [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Unable to orchestrate start VM instance {id: "83", name:
>>> "v-83-VM", uuid: "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0",
>>> type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable to create deployment, no usable volumes
>>> found for the VM: 83].
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to create
>>> deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.findSuitablePoolsForVolumes(DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java:1569)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.checkClustersforDestination(DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java:1217)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.planDeployment(DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java:527)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1126)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5315)
>>> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor945.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>> at
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5439)
>>> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:620)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:48)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:45)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:568)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
>>> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,262 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Done executing VM work job:
>>> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart{"dcId":0,"userId":1,"accountId":1,"vmId":83,"handlerName":"VirtualMachineManagerImpl"}
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,263 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Complete async job-3539, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 0,
>>> result:
>>> rO0ABXNyAC9jb20uY2xvdWQudXRpbHMuZXhjZXB0aW9uLkNsb3VkUnVudGltZUV4Y2VwdGlvbgAAAABWTU9yAwABSQALY3NFcnJvckNvZGV4cgAaamF2YS5sYW5nLlJ1bnRpbWVFeGNlcHRpb26eXwZHCjSD5QIAAHhyABNqYXZhLmxhbmcuRXhjZXB0aW9u0P0fPho7HMQCAAB4cgATamF2YS5sYW5nLlRocm93YWJsZdXGNSc5d7jLAwAETAAFY2F1c2V0ABVMamF2YS9sYW5nL1Rocm93YWJsZTtMAA1kZXRhaWxNZXNzYWdldAASTGphdmEvbGFuZy9TdHJpbmc7WwAKc3RhY2tUcmFjZXQAHltMamF2YS9sYW5nL1N0YWNrVHJhY2VFbGVtZW50O0wAFHN1cHByZXNzZWRFeGNlcHRpb25zdAAQTGphdmEvdXRpbC9MaXN0O3hwcQB-AAh0ANRVbmFibGUgdG8gb3JjaGVzdHJhdGUgc3RhcnQgVk0gaW5zdGFuY2Uge2lkOiAiODMiLCBuYW1lOiAidi04My1WTSIsIHV1aWQ6ICJiMWQxZjljNi1lYWZlLTQ1MjctOTMzNS1lNjQ5YzY0NmFhYjAiLCB0eXBlPSJDb25zb2xlUHJveHkifSBkdWUgdG8gW1VuYWJsZSB0byBjcmVhdGUgZGVwbG95bWVudCwgbm8gdXNhYmxlIHZvbHVtZXMgZm91bmQgZm9yIHRoZSBWTTogODNdLnVyAB5bTGphdmEubGFuZy5TdGFja1RyYWNlRWxlbWVudDsCRio8PP0iOQIAAHhwAAAAE3NyABtqYXZhLmxhbmcuU3RhY2tUcmFjZUVsZW1lbnRhCcWaJjbdhQIACEIABmZvcm1hdEkACmxpbmVOdW1iZXJMAA9jbGFzc0xvYWRlck5hbWVxAH4ABUwADmRlY2xhcmluZ0NsYXNzcQB-AAVMAAhmaWxlTmFtZXEAfgAFTAAKbWV0aG9kTmFtZXEAfgAFTAAKbW9kdWxlTmFtZXEAfgAFTAANbW9kdWxlVmVyc2lvbnEAfgAFeHABAAAUx3QAA2FwcHQAJmNvbS5jbG91ZC52bS5WaXJ0dWFsTWFjaGluZU1hbmFnZXJJbXBsdAAeVmlydHVhbE1hY2hpbmVNYW5hZ2VySW1wbC5qYXZhdAAQb3JjaGVzdHJhdGVTdGFydHBwc3EAfgAMAP____9wdAAvamRrLmludGVybmFsLnJlZmxlY3QuR2VuZXJhdGVkTWV0aG9kQWNjZXNzb3I5NDVwdAAGaW52b2tlcHBzcQB-AAwCAAAAK3B0ADFqZGsuaW50ZXJuYWwucmVmbGVjdC5EZWxlZ2F0aW5nTWV0aG9kQWNjZXNzb3JJbXBsdAAhRGVsZWdhdGluZ01ldGhvZEFjY2Vzc29ySW1wbC5qYXZhcQB-ABR0AAlqYXZhLmJhc2V0AAcxMS4wLjE2c3EAfgAMAgAAAjZwdAAYamF2YS5sYW5nLnJlZmxlY3QuTWV0aG9kdAALTWV0aG9kLmphdmFxAH4AFHEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwBAAAAa3EAfgAOdAAiY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya0pvYkhhbmRsZXJQcm94eXQAGlZtV29ya0pvYkhhbmRsZXJQcm94eS5qYXZhdAAPaGFuZGxlVm1Xb3JrSm9icHBzcQB-AAwBAAAVP3EAfgAOcQB-AA9xAH4AEHEAfgAgcHBzcQB-AAwBAAAAZnEAfgAOdAAgY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya0pvYkRpc3BhdGNoZXJ0ABhWbVdvcmtKb2JEaXNwYXRjaGVyLmphdmF0AAZydW5Kb2JwcHNxAH4ADAEAAAJscQB-AA50AD9vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmNsb3Vkc3RhY2suZnJhbWV3b3JrLmpvYnMuaW1wbC5Bc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsJDV0ABhBc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsLmphdmF0AAxydW5JbkNvbnRleHRwcHNxAH4ADAEAAAAwcQB-AA50AD5vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmNsb3Vkc3RhY2subWFuYWdlZC5jb250ZXh0Lk1hbmFnZWRDb250ZXh0UnVubmFibGUkMXQAG01hbmFnZWRDb250ZXh0UnVubmFibGUuamF2YXQAA3J1bnBwc3EAfgAMAQAAADdxAH4ADnQAQm9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuaW1wbC5EZWZhdWx0TWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHQkMXQAGkRlZmF1bHRNYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dC5qYXZhdAAEY2FsbHBwc3EAfgAMAQAAAGZxAH4ADnQAQG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuaW1wbC5EZWZhdWx0TWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHRxAH4AMHQAD2NhbGxXaXRoQ29udGV4dHBwc3EAfgAMAQAAADRxAH4ADnEAfgAzcQB-ADB0AA5ydW5XaXRoQ29udGV4dHBwc3EAfgAMAQAAAC1xAH4ADnQAPG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuTWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHRSdW5uYWJsZXEAfgAscQB-AC1wcHNxAH4ADAEAAAI4cQB-AA5xAH4AJ3EAfgAocQB-AC1wcHNxAH4ADAIAAAIDcHQALmphdmEudXRpbC5jb25jdXJyZW50LkV4ZWN1dG9ycyRSdW5uYWJsZUFkYXB0ZXJ0AA5FeGVjdXRvcnMuamF2YXEAfgAxcQB-ABhxAH4AGXNxAH4ADAIAAAEIcHQAH2phdmEudXRpbC5jb25jdXJyZW50LkZ1dHVyZVRhc2t0AA9GdXR1cmVUYXNrLmphdmFxAH4ALXEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwCAAAEaHB0ACdqYXZhLnV0aWwuY29uY3VycmVudC5UaHJlYWRQb29sRXhlY3V0b3J0ABdUaHJlYWRQb29sRXhlY3V0b3IuamF2YXQACXJ1bldvcmtlcnEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwCAAACdHB0AC5qYXZhLnV0aWwuY29uY3VycmVudC5UaHJlYWRQb29sRXhlY3V0b3IkV29ya2VycQB-AEJxAH4ALXEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcQB-AAwCAAADPXB0ABBqYXZhLmxhbmcuVGhyZWFkdAALVGhyZWFkLmphdmFxAH4ALXEAfgAYcQB-ABlzcgAfamF2YS51dGlsLkNvbGxlY3Rpb25zJEVtcHR5TGlzdHq4F7Q8p57eAgAAeHB4AAAQmncIAAAAAAAAAAB4
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Publish async job-3539 complete on message bus
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Wake up jobs related to job-3539
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,264 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Update db status for job-3539
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,266 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539 ctx-073f2751)
>>> (logid:ba10fec5) Wake up jobs joined with job-3539 and disjoin all subjobs
>>> created from job- 3539
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,276 DEBUG [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5) Done
>>> with run of VM work job: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for VM 83, job origin:
>>> 3445
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,276 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5) Done
>>> executing com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart for job-3539
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,278 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor]
>>> (Work-Job-Executor-58:ctx-dd8fe695 job-3445/job-3539) (logid:ba10fec5)
>>> Remove job-3539 from job monitoring
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,285 WARN [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
>>> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) Unable to allocate console
>>> proxy standby capacity for zone [1] due to [Unable to orchestrate start VM
>>> instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
>>> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable
>>> to create deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83].].
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to orchestrate
>>> start VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
>>> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable
>>> to create deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83].
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5319)
>>> at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor945.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>> at
>>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
>>> at
>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:5439)
>>> at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:620)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:48)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:45)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:568)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
>>> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
>>> at
>>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
>>> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,287 DEBUG [c.c.a.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter]
>>> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) received console proxy alert
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,288 DEBUG [c.c.a.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter]
>>> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) Console proxy creation
>>> failure, zone: blabla
>>> 2022-08-29 10:51:56,289 WARN [c.c.a.AlertManagerImpl]
>>> (consoleproxy-1:ctx-88c25b3a) (logid:d39faaa7) alertType=[10]
>>> dataCenterId=[1] podId=[null] clusterId=[null] message=[Console proxy
>>> creation failure. zone: blabla, error details: Unable to orchestrate start
>>> VM instance {id: "83", name: "v-83-VM", uuid:
>>> "b1d1f9c6-eafe-4527-9335-e649c646aab0", type="ConsoleProxy"} due to [Unable
>>> to create deployment, no usable volumes found for the VM: 83].].
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Mo., 29. Aug. 2022 um 09:40 Uhr schrieb Slavka Peleva
>>> <slav...@storpool.com.invalid>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Did you recreate the system VMs? In the 4.17 version, the
>>>> `systemvm.iso` is
>>>> deprecated. In its place, you should have the file on agents
>>>> `/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/agent.zip`.
>>>> Can you share the complete log if the system VMs are newly created after
>>>> the upgrade?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Slavka
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 2:16 PM vas...@gmx.de <vas...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > faceing some challanges again after upgradeing to 4.17.
>>>> > Did as explained in the docs.
>>>> >
>>>> > Afterwards I am now not able to migrate system VMs to different hosts.
>>>> > Getting the error
>>>> > "Exception during migrate: org.libvirt.LibvirtException: Cannot access
>>>> > storage file '/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso': No such
>>>> file
>>>> > or directory"
>>>> >
>>>> > Checked the exitstence of the file on the servers:
>>>> > Mangement-Server has a "systemvm.iso.bak"
>>>> > Hosts - no "systemvm.iso" at all present.
>>>> >
>>>> > Maybe someone has an idea on how to move on with this?
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Chris
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
