You mean another physical network completely? That's also possible, but a bit more complex. In your case, can't you just use another VLAN in the same physical network?
Cheers, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Lukáš Mrtvý <lukas.mr...@gmail.com> Sent: 03 January 2023 15:43 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple public networks per zone ? Hello, I am talking about using another "cable" as another public network to deploy system VMs to. For example this https://mermaid.live/view#pako:eNptkDFvAjEMhf-K5alInNoy3toulcpStiqLuRgu4uKcgiOEgP9e56Corbo9P33W8_MJu-QZW9xmGnt4_3ACkFNRztA0zTmS0JYji4KwHlLenYG1f_6DjWU9hO4X8lSRIEaY-_B2E7N_cHiEA8m0tPi5VNFbSLX3ZX098mVIxa-Uul214R4G98smtYAqWTzOMXKOFLz1PFXTofZWymFr0vOGyqAOnVwMpaJpdZQOW82F51hGT8qvgSw8fpsjyWdKNm5o2NvMPmjKy-srp49evgCD7nXA - public network ( RFC1918 ) is reachable via router or other devices ( haproxy, vpn ) on this network, for example haproxy doing reverse proxy for cloudstack ui - management network ( RFC1918 ) is available only for certain peope via conditional routing - public network / wan ( IPv4 pool ) is directly connected to the internet út 3. 1. 2023 v 14:17 odesílatel Alex Mattioli <alex.matti...@shapeblue.com> napsal: > Hi Lukáš, > Definite possible. > You can just add a new "public" IP range to your zone and select the > option "Set Reservation" and then "SystemVM". You then need to destroy > your SystemVMs, they will be recreated with those IPs. > Cheers, > Alex > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lukáš Mrtvý <lukas.mr...@gmail.com> > Sent: 31 December 2022 10:37 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Multiple public networks per zone ? > > Is possible to create multiple public networks per zone ? ( traffic type: > Public ) > I would like to put systemvms to this network to save two "Public" > IPv4, these arent cheap these days. The use case would be to deploy > systemvms to > RFC1918 external network and use reverse proxy to access cloudstack > webui and systemvms from the internet via this reverse proxy. Other > one public network would be an actual WAN. ( NAT isnt solution for me > ) Thanks BR, LM > -- S pozdravem Lukáš Mrtvý
