Hi Byran, They have copied some repos to OpenSDN on github. https://github.com/OpenSDN-io
There were already some changes made to some repos. -Wei On Wednesday, September 25, 2024, Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Speaking of Tungsten Plugin, what happened with the OpenSDN integration? > > Last i heard was that they formed a committee after Tungsten project was > closed, but havent heard any news since? > > Reagrds, > Bryan > On 18 Sep 2024 at 10:22 PM +0800, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > Thanks Byran. > > > > I think we will definitely keep the following the plugins > > - kvm, vmware, xenserver, simulator > > - ovs, vxlan, nsx, tungsten, internal-lb > > > > hyperv is not well-maintained, but I prefer to keep it. ovm/ovm3/ucs > > support could be dropped. > > > > for the network plugins, I do not have preferences. good to know that > Palo > > alto is interested. > > in ACS 4.21 or 4.22, you might see some more VNF improvements (e.g. a > > provider framework and an implementation) > > > > > > Kind regards, > > Wei > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 3:25 PM Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Wei Zhou, > > > > > > We dont use any of the plugins listed, but some do stand out: > > > > > > # HyperV # We dont use it right now, but would definitely use it if it > was > > > more mature. Some enterprise-ey applications we use require HyperV > (other > > > than Vmware) for some reason (Eg. Oneidentity Privilege Access Mgmt > > > System), so we maintain a small cluster of HyperV outside of > cloudstack. > > > But if there's no intention to enhance these, id suggest to remove it. > With > > > people moving out of Vmware and looking for alternatives, Cloudstack > docs > > > should show the fairly supported items. Its just better on optics and > CS > > > adoption. > > > > > > # Palo Alto # I believe this was built by CloudOps by Aptum in 2014? We > > > were researching this extensively cause we wanted to implement some > NGFW > > > capabilities in our setup, but it seems the project wasn't maintained > over > > > the years. Im not sure whos using it, but it's sad there wasn't much > > > uptake. Probably because Palo Alto is really expensive now. If there > was a > > > fortinet plugin, we'd be very interested. But right now, we settled on > > > using VNF + L2 Networks. > > > > > > Note: Please dont remove VXLAN plugin... will self destruct. > > > > > > > > > >
