Hi Byran,

They have copied some repos to OpenSDN on github.
https://github.com/OpenSDN-io

There were already some changes made to some repos.

-Wei


On Wednesday, September 25, 2024, Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Speaking of Tungsten Plugin, what happened with the OpenSDN integration?
>
> Last i heard was that they formed a committee after Tungsten project was
> closed, but havent heard any news since?
>
> Reagrds,
> Bryan
> On 18 Sep 2024 at 10:22 PM +0800, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > Thanks Byran.
> >
> > I think we will definitely keep the following the plugins
> > - kvm, vmware, xenserver, simulator
> > - ovs, vxlan, nsx, tungsten, internal-lb
> >
> > hyperv is not well-maintained, but I prefer to keep it. ovm/ovm3/ucs
> > support could be dropped.
> >
> > for the network plugins, I do not have preferences. good to know that
> Palo
> > alto is interested.
> > in ACS 4.21 or 4.22, you might see some more VNF improvements (e.g. a
> > provider framework and an implementation)
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Wei
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 3:25 PM Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Wei Zhou,
> > >
> > > We dont use any of the plugins listed, but some do stand out:
> > >
> > > # HyperV # We dont use it right now, but would definitely use it if it
> was
> > > more mature. Some enterprise-ey applications we use require HyperV
> (other
> > > than Vmware) for some reason (Eg. Oneidentity Privilege Access Mgmt
> > > System), so we maintain a small cluster of HyperV outside of
> cloudstack.
> > > But if there's no intention to enhance these, id suggest to remove it.
> With
> > > people moving out of Vmware and looking for alternatives, Cloudstack
> docs
> > > should show the fairly supported items. Its just better on optics and
> CS
> > > adoption.
> > >
> > > # Palo Alto # I believe this was built by CloudOps by Aptum in 2014? We
> > > were researching this extensively cause we wanted to implement some
> NGFW
> > > capabilities in our setup, but it seems the project wasn't maintained
> over
> > > the years. Im not sure whos using it, but it's sad there wasn't much
> > > uptake. Probably because Palo Alto is really expensive now. If there
> was a
> > > fortinet plugin, we'd be very interested. But right now, we settled on
> > > using VNF + L2 Networks.
> > >
> > > Note: Please dont remove VXLAN plugin... will self destruct.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to