Hi Wei Zhou, I can see some updates to the OpenSDN repos recently. Im guessing its just a wait and see then? And for cloudstack community to decide if this is something worth continuing down the line?
Regards, Bryan On 26 Sep 2024 at 3:07 AM +0800, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hi Byran, > > They have copied some repos to OpenSDN on github. > https://github.com/OpenSDN-io > > There were already some changes made to some repos. > > -Wei > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2024, Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > Speaking of Tungsten Plugin, what happened with the OpenSDN integration? > > > > Last i heard was that they formed a committee after Tungsten project was > > closed, but havent heard any news since? > > > > Reagrds, > > Bryan > > On 18 Sep 2024 at 10:22 PM +0800, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > > Thanks Byran. > > > > > > I think we will definitely keep the following the plugins > > > - kvm, vmware, xenserver, simulator > > > - ovs, vxlan, nsx, tungsten, internal-lb > > > > > > hyperv is not well-maintained, but I prefer to keep it. ovm/ovm3/ucs > > > support could be dropped. > > > > > > for the network plugins, I do not have preferences. good to know that > > Palo > > > alto is interested. > > > in ACS 4.21 or 4.22, you might see some more VNF improvements (e.g. a > > > provider framework and an implementation) > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Wei > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 3:25 PM Bryan Tiang <bryantian...@hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Wei Zhou, > > > > > > > > We dont use any of the plugins listed, but some do stand out: > > > > > > > > # HyperV # We dont use it right now, but would definitely use it if it > > was > > > > more mature. Some enterprise-ey applications we use require HyperV > > (other > > > > than Vmware) for some reason (Eg. Oneidentity Privilege Access Mgmt > > > > System), so we maintain a small cluster of HyperV outside of > > cloudstack. > > > > But if there's no intention to enhance these, id suggest to remove it. > > With > > > > people moving out of Vmware and looking for alternatives, Cloudstack > > docs > > > > should show the fairly supported items. Its just better on optics and > > CS > > > > adoption. > > > > > > > > # Palo Alto # I believe this was built by CloudOps by Aptum in 2014? We > > > > were researching this extensively cause we wanted to implement some > > NGFW > > > > capabilities in our setup, but it seems the project wasn't maintained > > over > > > > the years. Im not sure whos using it, but it's sad there wasn't much > > > > uptake. Probably because Palo Alto is really expensive now. If there > > was a > > > > fortinet plugin, we'd be very interested. But right now, we settled on > > > > using VNF + L2 Networks. > > > > > > > > Note: Please dont remove VXLAN plugin... will self destruct. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
