"Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> writes: > Ferenc Wágner <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.04.2016 um 17:07 in Nachricht > >> I'm using the "balanced" placement strategy with good success. It >> distributes our VM resources according to memory size perfectly. >> However, I'd like to take the NUMA topology into account. That means >> each host should have several capacity pools (of each capacity type) to >> arrange the resources in. Can Pacemaker do something like this? > > I think you can, but depending on VM technology, the hypervisor may > not care much about NUMA. More details?
The NUMA technology would be handled by the resource agent, if it was told by Pacemaker which utilization zone to use on its host. I just need the policy engine to do more granular resource placement and communicate the selected zone to the resource agents on the hosts. I'm pretty sure there's no direct support for this, but there might be different approaches I missed. Thus I'm looking for ideas here. -- Thanks, Feri _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
