On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:05:52 -0600 Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 10:24 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 01:21 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:10:50 -0600 > > > Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Pacemaker 2.0 will be a major update whose main goal is to remove > > > > support for deprecated, legacy syntax, in order to make the code > > > > base > > > > more maintainable into the future. There will also be some > > > > changes > > > > to > > > > default configuration behavior, and the command-line tools. > > > > > > > > I'm hoping to release the first release candidate in the next > > > > couple of > > > > weeks. > > > > > > Great news! Congrats. > > > > > > > We'll have a longer than usual rc phase to allow for plenty of > > > > testing. > > > > > > > > A thoroughly detailed list of changes will be maintained on the > > > > ClusterLabs wiki: > > > > > > > > https://wiki.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Pacemaker_2.0_Changes > > > > > > > > These changes are not final, and we can restore functionality if > > > > there > > > > is a strong need for it. Most user-visible changes are complete > > > > (in > > > > the > > > > 2.0 branch on github); major changes are still expected, but > > > > primarily > > > > to the C API. > > > > > > > > Some highlights: > > > > > > > > * Only Corosync version 2 will be supported as the underlying > > > > cluster > > > > layer. Support for Heartbeat and Corosync 1 is removed. (Support > > > > for > > > > the new kronosnet layer will be added in a future version.) > > > > > > I thought (according to some conference slides from sept 2017) knet > > > was mostly > > > related to corosync directly? Is there some visible impact on > > > Pacemaker too? > > > > You're right -- it's more accurate to say that corosync 3 will > > support > > knet, and I'm not yet aware whether the corosync 3 API will require > > any > > changes in Pacemaker. > > Good news! The corosync developers say that knet support will be > completely transparent to pacemaker, so pacemaker already supports > corosync 3. :-) Perfect! Thanks for the confirmation and feedback :) ++ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org