On 24/09/18 13:12, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Jan Friesse <jfrie...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Have you had a time to play with packaging current alpha to find out >> if there are no issues? I had no problems with Fedora, but Debian has >> a lot of patches, and I would be really grateful if we could reduce >> them a lot - so please let me know if there is patch which you've sent >> PR for and it's not merged yet. > > Hi Honza, > > Sorry for the delay. You've already merged my PR for two simple typos, > thanks! Beyond that, there really isn't much in our patch queue > anymore. As far as I can see, current master even has a patch for error > propagation in notifyd, which will let us drop one more! And we arrive > at the example configs. We prefer syslog for several reasons > (copytruncate rotation isn't pretty, decoupling possible I/O stalls) and > we haven't got the /var/log/cluster legacy. But more importantly, the > knet default transport requires a nodelist instead of interfaces, unlike > mcast udp. The "ring" terminology might need a change as well, > especially ring0_addr. So I'd welcome an overhaul of the (now knet) > example config, but I'm not personally qualified for doing that. :) > > Finally, something totally unrelated: the libtotem_pg shared object > isn't standalone anymore, it has several undefined symbols (icmap_get_*, > stats_knet_add_member, etc) which are defined in the corosync binary. > Why is it still a separate object then? >
I argued a while back for making it a static library or just building it straight into corosync. It makes little sense to me having it as a shared library any more - if it ever did. All it really achieves (IMHO) is to make debugging more complicated than it ought to be. Chrissie _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org