On 01/11/2019 01:57 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > What's the status of Pacemaker 2 support in SBD? I can see several > commits since the 1.3.1 tag concerning this, but no conclusion. Is the > current state considered stable enough for packaging? If it is, can we > ask for an official (pre)release (I mean a tag) to work with? That sounds like a good idea.
The current state should be fit for Pacemaker 2. Afaik we don't have strict rules for SBD how we count up versions. Still the Pacemaker 2 compatibility might make it worth a 1.4.0 instead of 1.3.2. (incompatibility.features.fixes ...) Any thoughts? Anything you still want to have in before tagging? Regards, Klaus _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
