Klaus Wenninger <[email protected]> writes: > On 01/11/2019 01:57 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> What's the status of Pacemaker 2 support in SBD? I can see several >> commits since the 1.3.1 tag concerning this, but no conclusion. Is the >> current state considered stable enough for packaging? If it is, can we >> ask for an official (pre)release (I mean a tag) to work with? > > That sounds like a good idea. > The current state should be fit for Pacemaker 2.
Splendid! > Afaik we don't have strict rules for SBD how we count up versions. > Still the Pacemaker 2 compatibility might make it worth a 1.4.0 > instead of 1.3.2. (incompatibility.features.fixes ...) > Any thoughts? That certainly works for us. > Anything you still want to have in before tagging? I opened https://github.com/ClusterLabs/sbd/pull/62 with our current patches, but I'm just a middle man here. Valentin, do you agree to upstream these two remaining patches of yours? -- Thanks, Feri _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
