On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:16:04PM +0000, Andrew Price wrote:
> The only thing that stands out to me with this config is the lack of
> ordering constraint between dlm and lvmlockd. Not sure if that's the issue
> though.
They are both in the storage group so the order should be dlm than lockd?
Clone: storage-clone
Meta Attrs: interleave=true target-role=Started
Group: storage
Resource: dlm (class=ocf provider=pacemaker type=controld)
Resource: lockd (class=ocf provider=heartbeat type=lvmlockd)
--
Valentin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: [email protected]
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
