On 16/01/2019 12:26, Valentin Vidic wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:16:04PM +0000, Andrew Price wrote:
The only thing that stands out to me with this config is the lack of
ordering constraint between dlm and lvmlockd. Not sure if that's the issue
though.
They are both in the storage group so the order should be dlm than lockd?
Clone: storage-clone
Meta Attrs: interleave=true target-role=Started
Group: storage
Resource: dlm (class=ocf provider=pacemaker type=controld)
Resource: lockd (class=ocf provider=heartbeat type=lvmlockd)
Yes, you're right. I managed to confuse myself thinking about clones and
groups together :)
Andy
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list: [email protected]
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
