On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:36:52AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > I assume this is path failover time? As I doubt storage latency can be > that high? > > I wonder, does IBM have official guidelines for integrating SBD with > their storage? Otherwise where this requirement comes from?
Yes, we had problems with SBD when the timeouts were lower, so it is now configured based on this info: # Set SCSI command timeout to 120s (default == 30 or 60) for IBM 2145 devices https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ST3FR7_8.1.1/com.ibm.storwize.v7000.811.doc/svc_linux_settings.html -- Valentin _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
