Thanks a lot for all the information. I could see that the issue was indeed with the PEER_WINDOW. I increased it and now it is working.
Thanks & Regards Dileep Nair Togaf Certified Enterprise Architect From: Valentin Vidic <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 04/03/2019 01:26 PM Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Issue with DB2 HADR cluster Sent by: "Users" <[email protected]> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:36:52AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > I assume this is path failover time? As I doubt storage latency can be > that high? > > I wonder, does IBM have official guidelines for integrating SBD with > their storage? Otherwise where this requirement comes from? Yes, we had problems with SBD when the timeouts were lower, so it is now configured based on this info: # Set SCSI command timeout to 120s (default == 30 or 60) for IBM 2145 devices https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ST3FR7_8.1.1/com.ibm.storwize.v7000.811.doc/svc_linux_settings.html -- Valentin _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.clusterlabs.org_mailman_listinfo_users&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=syjI0TzCX7--Qy0vFS1xy17vob_50Cur84Jg-YprJuw&m=wC-0hCcJ5EJgDwQYM6IGC7YFmh0llzlM21u4FRDEWjI&s=EElhExf_586KA8W5cCqJf2qPuEePMN0OKP6XR2OPiv8&e= ClusterLabs home: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.clusterlabs.org_&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=syjI0TzCX7--Qy0vFS1xy17vob_50Cur84Jg-YprJuw&m=wC-0hCcJ5EJgDwQYM6IGC7YFmh0llzlM21u4FRDEWjI&s=gpeRMXxOx687efR5nUTYvwRw_37ZvqqtiSikE7oMV2U&e=
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
