Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> > > >>> d tbsky <tbs...@gmail.com> schrieb am 08.04.2021 um 05:52 in Nachricht > <CAC6SzHLFBeVjjrt=k9fSKUoG=jrg6u-vi6qehmuc_rrcnzr...@mail.gmail.com>: > > Hi: > > I found RHEL 8.2 support single node cluster now. but I didn't > > find further document to explain the concept. RHEL 8.2 also support > > "disaster recovery cluster". so I think maybe a single node disaster > > recovery cluster is not bad. > > > > I think corosync is still necessary under single node cluster. or > > is there other new style of configuration? > > IMHO if you want a single-.node cluster, and you are not planning to add more > nodes, you'll be better off using a utility like monit to manage your > processes...
sorry I didn't mention pacemaker in my previous post. I want a single node pacemaker disaster recovery cluster, which can be managed by normal pacemaker utilities like pcs. maybe there is other case which single node pacemaker cluster is useful, I just don't know now. _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
