On 4/8/21 8:16 AM, Reid Wahl wrote:


On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:46 PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86...@yahoo.com <mailto:hunter86...@yahoo.com>> wrote:

    I always though that the setup is the same, just the node count is
    only one.

    I guess you need pcs, corosync + pacemaker.
    If RH is going to support it, they will require fencing. Most
    probably sbd or ipmi are the best candidates.


I don't think we do require fencing for single-node clusters. (Anyone at Red Hat, feel free to comment.) I vaguely recall an internal mailing list or IRC conversation where we discussed this months ago, but I can't find it now. I've also checked our support policies documentation, and it's not mentioned in the "cluster size" doc or the "fencing" doc.

The closest thing I can find is the following, from the cluster size doc[1]:
~~~
RHEL 8.2 and later: Support for 1 or more nodes

  * Single node clusters do not support DLM and GFS2 filesystems (as
    they require fencing).

~~~

To me that suggests that fencing isn't required in a single-node cluster. Maybe sbd could work (I haven't thought it through), but conventional power fencing (e.g., fence_ipmilan) wouldn't. That's because most conventional power fencing agents require sending a "power on" signal after the "power off" is complete.
And moreover you have to be alive enough to kick off
conventional power fencing to self-fence ;-)
With sbd the hardware-watchdog should kick in.

Klaus

[1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/3069031 <https://access.redhat.com/articles/3069031>


    Best Regards,
    Strahil Nikolov

        On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:52, d tbsky
        <tbs...@gmail.com <mailto:tbs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
        Hi:
            I found RHEL 8.2 support single node cluster now.  but I
        didn't
        find further document to explain the concept. RHEL 8.2 also
        support
        "disaster recovery cluster". so I think maybe a single node
        disaster
        recovery cluster is not bad.

          I think corosync is still necessary under single node
        cluster. or
        is there other new style of configuration?

            thanks for help!
        _______________________________________________
        Manage your subscription:
        https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
        <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users>

        ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
        <https://www.clusterlabs.org/>

    _______________________________________________
    Manage your subscription:
    https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
    <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users>

    ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
    <https://www.clusterlabs.org/>



--
Regards,

Reid Wahl, RHCA
Senior Software Maintenance Engineer, Red Hat
CEE - Platform Support Delivery - ClusterHA

_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

Reply via email to