On 22/02/22 11:59 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:27:16 +0000
lejeczek via Users <[email protected]> wrote:
...
Perhaps as the author(s) you can chip in and/or help via comments to
rectify this:
...
Problem: package resource-agents-paf-4.9.0-7.el8.x86_64 requires
PAF doesn't share the same release plans than the resource-agents project, but
it seems RH included it in their build process as part as the resource-agents
one, releasing it with the same version number:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872754
RH is delivering PAF since the RHSA-2021:4139 security fixes and update,
in november 2021: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:4139
I wasn't aware of this packaging and how it is built, neither of the repository
it is delivered to.
I am only aware of the RPM I am delivering on github, and the one provided by
the PGDG repository: https://yum.postgresql.org/packages/
...
How I understand that is that CentOS guys/community have PAF in
'resilientstorage' repo.
I have no idea why the PAF package is in this repo and not in the
HighAvailability one where I suppose it should be host. Compare:
* http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/HighAvailability/x86_64/os/Packages/
* http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/ResilientStorage/x86_64/os/Packages/
Ping Oyvind, maybe you have some input about this as the resource-agents
package maintainer?
I dont know how it got excluded on CentOS Stream only, but I've
created a bz to fix it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056926
Oyvind Albrigtsen
Regards,
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
