Yeah, there's definitely cases like that where it'd be nice. I think that post I saw mostly emphasized how hard it'd be to implement. ;-)
From: Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [resent] map:part's processed in parallel? Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:30:18 -0700
Actually, I can envision a case where I could get a big gain out of parallel
execution. We may need to invoke several EJBs, each from its own generator.
I would love for those to be executed in parallel.
Ralph
-----Original Message----- From: Sonny Sukumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [resent] map:part's processed in parallel?
Thanks for examining the code for me Upayavira. I saw another post in the
archives explaining why it'd be too hard for the map:parts to be constructed
in parallel and for no real gain (SAX events from each part coming in at random times and getting mixed up).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
