On 11 Aug 2003 at 19:30, Ralph Goers wrote: > Actually, I can envision a case where I could get a big gain out of > parallel execution. We may need to invoke several EJBs, each from its > own generator. I would love for those to be executed in parallel. Check out the CIncludeTransformer. The Javadocs suggest that you can request the includes to happen in parallel (I remember a discussion about it). So if you use CInclude rather than aggregate, you may well be able to get your parallel execution behaviour.
Regards, Upayavira > -----Original Message----- > From: Sonny Sukumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [resent] map:part's processed in parallel? > > > > Thanks for examining the code for me Upayavira. I saw another post in > the archives explaining why it'd be too hard for the map:parts to be > constructed > > in parallel and for no real gain (SAX events from each part coming in > at random times and getting mixed up). > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
