Sonny: It's no more browser specific than finding a client with extra special XML tree support... and since JavaScript (well, ECMAScript) and DHTML are standardized it _shouldn't_ be an issue, even if it is :).
Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sonny Sukumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 8:19 PM Subject: Re: best browsers for viewing xml? > > Ahhh, I can see how that might cause problems with some browsers. > > >From: "Jay Freeman \(saurik\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sonny: > > > >JavaScript/DHTML :) > > > >Sincerely, > >Jay Freeman (saurik) > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Sonny Sukumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 7:59 PM > >Subject: Re: best browsers for viewing xml? > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jay Freeman \(saurik\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > >One such XSL/T comes with Cocoon: xml2html.xslt . I believe it even > > > >supports > > > >+/- expansion, although I remember there being something wrong with > >it... > > > >like it didn't support namespaces correctly or something and just > >stripped > > > >them from the output. I'm not quite sure, have only played with it a > > > >little. > > > > > > Oh that's interesting--maybe I'll take a look at that sometime. But how > >can > > > one do +/- expansion with a mere stylesheet? I thought that would > >require > >a > > > browser plugin or embedded browser functionality. > > > > > > Sonny --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
