Hi Antonio,
Hmm. I don't know if my opinion counts very much but it bothers me, that of
the view of an xsp-programmer the procedures of naming the ns and the tags
for accessing the session respectively the request are different... :(
By the way: thanks for the wiki-page. I wish there would be more
documentation for the input modules and contexts (see e.g. my question about
configuring Modules in the sitemap). Modules are very mighty and for my
opinion they are helping to better understand the flow of parameters in a
sitemap...
That's why I'm switching to explicitely make out the parameters for
components in a pipeline instead of using something like the
"use-request-parameters" option. So (now that I have the chance to chat with
you ;) ) why is it so complicated to have default values? Wouldn' it be good
to have an default-Attribut for every Input-Module, like:
<map:parameter name="message"
value="{session-context:temporary/data/message}"
default="{default:loginmessage}"/>
the value of the default attribute could point to the defaultModule (here
instantiated as "default") /values/loginmessage that is either a string or a
xml-structure.
It would also help to be able to configure these defaultModule values in the
sitemap in the "<map:component-configuration/>"-section like the global
variables (And they would overwrite equal values configured in the
cocoon.xconf or parent sitemaps). For my opinion it would help to improve
the understanding of a sitemap dramatically.
Yes, my proposition is not perfect but I hope you'll understand my intention
;).
Best regards,
Mat
> Von: "Antonio Gallardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 10:41:07 -0600 (CST)
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [newbie] Authentication-context in the auth.-framework
>
> Mathias Wiegard dijo:
>> Maybe a stupid question, but why this "-fw"? Will this also be used e.g.
>> at "<xsp-request-fw"? Why these differences in naming?
>
> The name was coined and currently a TM of Vadim Gritsenko. :-D
>
> "fw" means framework, because (as Vadim explained), the tag is related to
> the session-fw not to the environment.session. For more info see the track
> of the tag here:
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13070
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Antonio Gallardo
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
