On 20.11.2003 18:32, Geoff Howard wrote:

What's bad with HTML mails, they have a nicer appearance?.

Nah, mails could be really easily read as pure text without any need for styling. And I don't want to use the styling other people like. And if you provide multipart as you did the mail size increases heavily: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=106931836717732&w=2

And IIRC html mails are unreadable in the archives?

Pure HTML mails, yes, are unreadable: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106616211423973&w=2

Multipart mails provide text + HTML and so they are readable:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=106931836717732&w=2

Joerg


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to