Jean-Christophe Kermagoret dijo:
>  From a strict user point of view, I think it's really a must.
>
> Because compilation never goes the right way the first time.

????? I cannot believe it. Sorry.

> If you want java developers, why not ? But if you want other developers,
> I think it's best to have a cocoon-blank.war.

I think there is also Forrest.

> When you have a problem with compilation, even little, people are
> already far away.

Sorry, but, I don't see any Java line in the instructions I wrote below.

It is so dificult to write:

./build.sh
./cocoon.sh servlet

????

If someone is not able to do this. I think it is not a good idea for him
to use Cocoon at all:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106346491831839&w=2

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo

>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>>Scherler, Thorsten dijo:
>>
>>
>>>Hello since there will no be thus thing like a cocoon-blank.war till at
>>>least version 2.2. My question is can I create one and put it on my
>>>web-page for other users? I mean can I make a cocoon-blank.war and then
>>>offer it for download or will I have legal problems? I will NOT sell it,
>>>I just want to offer it to other user!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>This is very simple to create a blank war! I make it every time I update
>>from the CVS:
>>
>>1-copy build.properties to local.build.properties
>>2-In local.buld.properties comment the follwing properties:
>>
>>exclude.webapp.documentation=true
>>exclude.webapp.javadocs=true
>>exclude.webapp.samples=true
>>
>>exclude.deprecated=true
>>exclude.javadocs=true
>>
>>3-Rebuild cocoon using:
>>
>>./build.sh war
>>
>>That is all. Did you really think it is a must? I think we can write a
>>wiki page with this.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to