I'll not say which Cocoon is best but here is what I do know: Using Cocoon 2.1:
* Running an XSLT-intensive Cocoon App on a Solaris 8 box is slower than on a Windows box by default. * Tuning the Cocoon pooling configuration of the XSLT transformer is critical for speed. Also, the coyote connector under Tomcat 4.1.21 (at least) can use the HTTP content-encoding feature to compress the stream. I saw great performance gains in terms of network usage with this. Regards, Peter -----Original Message----- From: Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:24 PM To: cocoonuser maillist Subject: best cocoon version with regard to xsl transformation Hello! We are planning to migrate a web application from cocoon 1.8.2 to cocoon 2 to increase throughput and page response. Application will be hosted on Tomcat 4.1.12. It can also be upgraded to 4.1.29 if perf. gains are noticed. In the existing Web application most of the processing time has been found to be spent with xsl transformation. It currently uses Saxon. Which version of cocoon (cocoon 2.0.3, cocoon 2.1.2, cocoon 2.13) is best with regard to xslt processing time and throughtput. (Cocoon 1.8.2 seemed to lock the pages of the same url for considerable period of time during processing). Many Thanks Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
