Christoph Hermann wrote:
I didn't want to, thats why i didn't write it ;-)
Suse is, lets say "stubborn" in some cases, and very coloured and
"user-friendly" (imho).
<tongue-in-cheek>
Oh man, what a slam! Something's user friendly--it must be bad!
</tongue-in-cheek>
Honestly, when something works well and you don't have to think too hard
about stuff you shouldn't be thinking hard about--then its not bad.
From a linux system i expect to know what it does all the time, with Suse i do
not have that feeling. Hope this explains my opinion a little better.
And this is the real underlying problem: user expectation doesn't meet
user experience. If you are new to Linux, Suse is not bad. If you are
an experienced Linux user, then Suse does some things a little
differently than most of your standard distributions. Last time I
played with Suse (I admit it was a few years ago), it was one of the
nicest packages. For one thing the paper manual shipped with it was top
notch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
