Hi Andre! > Yeah, I guess that this would settle the matter then. One transaction > definition file to transact them all...
Maybe one last gap in addition to your thought about block-specific transaction-management: If one must somehow define special transaction purposes, e.g. different method-name-patterns, then usage of different transaction-managers could be fine. But I would try to avoid such design and spend a bit more effort upfront. Cheers ;) Patrick -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
