I get a 404 (Page not found) on that link. But you're right about the
missing FOPNGSerializer documentation.

Can someone give me more karma for the documentation please?

Jasha Joachimsthal 

www.onehippo.com
Amsterdam - Hippo B.V. Oosteinde 11 1017 WT Amsterdam +31(0)20-5224466 
San Francisco - Hippo USA Inc. 101 H Street, suite Q Petaluma CA
94952-3329 +1 (707) 773-4646

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lehtonen, Mika [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: vrijdag 15 augustus 2008 11:06
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Cocoon 2.2 FOP
> 
> Ok,
> 
> thanks Jasha for your exclusively clear answer!
> 
> BTW, the page 
> http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2/blocks/fop/1.0/1333_1_1.html
> (A complete list of all available Sitemap components, FOPNG) 
> doesn't even exist.
> 
> - mika -
> 
> Jasha Joachimsthal kirjoitti:
> > Hi Mika,
> >
> > cocoon-fop-ng-impl uses FOP 0.9x. cocoon-fop-impl uses FOP 
> 0.20.x The 
> > number of the Cocoon FOP block does not follow the FOP versioning.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jasha Joachimsthal
> >
> > www.onehippo.com
> > Amsterdam - Hippo B.V. Oosteinde 11 1017 WT Amsterdam 
> +31(0)20-5224466 
> > San Francisco - Hippo USA Inc. 101 H Street, suite Q Petaluma CA
> > 94952-3329 +1 (707) 773-4646
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lehtonen, Mika [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: vrijdag 15 augustus 2008 10:39
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: Cocoon 2.2 FOP
> >>
> >> Am I asking something silly or too obvious? I'd just like to get a 
> >> list as the following, which includes one column also for 
> the Cocoon 
> >> 2.2 FOP block.
> >>
> >> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> mika
> >>
> >> Lehtonen, Mika kirjoitti:
> >>     
> >>> Hi again,
> >>>
> >>> taking second steps on Cocoon 2.2 and I started to wonder
> >>>       
> >> whether the
> >>     
> >>> version number of  the FOP block follows the official FOP
> >>>       
> >> versioning.
> >>     
> >>> I have been using some 0.9x FOP in Cocoon 2.1.11, because the old
> >>> 0.20.5 was too far from the standard. So I have now my 
> XSL-FO files 
> >>> ported to work with that 0.9x. Do they work with Cocoon 
> 2.2 and its 
> >>> FOP block?
> >>>
> >>> - mika -
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>     
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>       
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >   
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to