On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Ken Starks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ...Aren't these objectives part of Cocoon 22 also ?  I though part of the
> rationale for blocks was that
> they are--beyond a small core-- optional and modular, you don't have to
> have any you don't need.
>
> So building a 'lightweight' cocoon App would be part of Cocoon 22
> already. Or are the core
> dependencies of 2.2 already too heavy a footprint ?...

I think the main difference is that Corona (er...Cocoon 3) is much
easier to embed and use from other frameworks, as its core has very
few external dependencies.

That's an important criteria for people who just want to use the nice
Cocoon stuff (pipelines mostly, in my case) in other environments, as
opposed to building apps completely on Cooon.

-Bertrand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to