The only way to work around this is what I've used in the past.

matchbypath/index.html/virtualrootfolder/themes/conservation

pattern="matchbypath/*.*/**"


From: Jos Snellings [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Sitemap: path matching

Hi Robby,

Here's an example:

       <a href="matchbypath/virtualrootfolder/themes/conservation/index.html"> 
conservation </a>

               => this is to be a hit for a matcher, and what I would like to 
pass to the generator:

               "matchbypath/{path}/{name}.{extension}"

           Of course, the pipeline matcher cannot know how many segments there 
will be.

Cheers,
Jos


On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Robby Pelssers 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can you give a few possible examples of the pattern that you're trying to match?

Ps.  Maybe a bit nasty as solution but let's say you want to handle multiple 
productId's


Pattern="generateProduct/*"

Example

generateProduct/[P1, P2, P3]

You just pass '[P1,P2,P3]' to your generator as a single argument and let the 
generator extract the ids.

Robby

From: Jos Snellings 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:31 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Sitemap: path matching

Hi all,

I am looking for a way to pass a variable number of sitemap parameters to a 
sitemap component:
I explain the use case:

"**" stands for non-greedy multiple segment matcher, no?

<map:match pattern="retrievebypath/**/{name}.{extension}">
      <map:generate type="retrieve">
            <map:parameter ?
      </map:generate>
</map:match>

Of course you could {1}, {2}, {3} .... but that is a clutch.
Is there an elegant way?

Kind regards,
Jos


--
The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: that there is no man
really clever who has not found that he is stupid.
        -- Gilbert K. Chesterson



--
The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: that there is no man
really clever who has not found that he is stupid.
        -- Gilbert K. Chesterson

Reply via email to