Yes. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, externer Mitarbeiter) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so, if each mvn-project exists in only one of the Continuum-instances, no > conflict should occur, right? > Deploying the artifact into Archiva is synchronized anyway, I suppose. > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. September 2008 13:39 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: running n parallel Continuum installations > > The potential issue with a single local repo with a parallel build is if > two > build try to download or install the same artifact in it. > Emmanuel > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, > externer Mitarbeiter) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Our project contains several hundred Maven-projects, which need to get > > tested and snaphots built using Continuum. > > My plan is to install a number of Continuum-webapps into a single JBoss > > AS-container, each one having its dedicated database. > > Anybody sees any potential issues in such scenario? > > > > (I read on the list that there is an issue related to accessing the local > > mvn-repo, but I don't understand what actually might cause any trouble > > here?!) > > >
