Marcin Jessa wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:44:54 +0200 Simon Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 06.09.2005, at 00:37, Matthew Dillon wrote:No, we are not putting anything based on lukemftpd n our tree. It's way too complex and has historically contained root-compromising bugs.I want our base system ftpd to be as simple as possible.I agree that the default ftpd should be simple.Please correct me if I am wrong but as far as I know NetBSD's ftpd does not support SSL. Wouldn't bsdftpd-ssl be a more appropriate software for a modern O.S ?
I think that the ftpd in base should only run from inetd, as you'll start looking for alternatives anyway if on the search for a serious FTP daemon. Therefore, SSL issues are a feature, not a requirement, and as such shouldn't be in base.
Cheers,
--
-- Thomas E. Spanjaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
