2005/9/6, Thomas E. Spanjaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Marcin Jessa wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:44:54 +0200 > > Simon Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On 06.09.2005, at 00:37, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >>> No, we are not putting anything based on lukemftpd n our tree. > >>>It's > >>> way too complex and has historically contained root-compromising > >>>bugs. > >>> I want our base system ftpd to be as simple as possible. > >> > >>I agree that the default ftpd should be simple. > > Please correct me if I am wrong but as far as I know NetBSD's ftpd does not > > support SSL. > > Wouldn't bsdftpd-ssl be a more appropriate software for a modern O.S ? > > I think that the ftpd in base should only run from inetd, as you'll > start looking for alternatives anyway if on the search for a serious FTP > daemon. Therefore, SSL issues are a feature, not a requirement, and as > such shouldn't be in base. > > Cheers, > -- > -- Thomas E. Spanjaard > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I doesnt believe that, or better disagree with them. My ftpd runs from rc.local: /usr/libexec/ftpd -D -l -l why? I deosn't really nedd inetd. i can't trust them..... but this is my paranoia..... > > >
