--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Danial Thom wrote: > > > > > > > That is the "Wall" for people who are on real > > networks. You could always count on the wall > > advancing as our buddies at AMD and Intel > > increased the GHZ. Now we're going sideways, > and > > many can't afford to have the wall regress to > > accommodate smoother audio performance. > > Danial > > this is the wall for *you* and only for you. Do > you want to know the truth > for me? I could not care less if you can route > gigabit links with BSD > and filter them with pf. If i was in the > situation to do that i would buy > dedicated hardware. But i care very much that > the software i am using runs > smoothly, and for that several processors give > a very considerable bonus. > With *my* present needs FreeBSD, DragonFly and > Linux give a > very good experience. There are certainly far > more machines running tomcat > or jboss servers with a lot of threads which > greatly and immediately benefit > from dual cores or more, than commodity > machines used to do the job of > dedicated hardware. > And yes, as Kris said, jemalloc works well at > present on FreeBSD. > Yeah, well the French don't care about much of anything now, do they? :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
