Okay, that's your blessed right. So, how about some ideas on what to use instead?
--- On 01/08/06, Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:29:55PM +0300, Yury Tarasievich wrote: > The next major show-stopper is the absence (as perceived by the g++ > and by the naked eye) of the struct __FILE and of the appropriate > member fields stlport expects. Which is the ultimate reason why I refuse to touch it. No program has the right to assume anything about the size of FILE, period. Joerg
