I thought I had previously seen (on this mailing list) advice that hammer was designed for use on 500GB systems or bigger. Accordingly, as I only have a 160GB drive, I am not using it.
But just now (after reading some of today's messages), I took a look at http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/ to learn more about hammer. There is says it is designed to be used on 50GB or more. So was I misreading earlier, or have improvements meant it is now practical for smaller file systems? -- Colin Adams Preston, Lancashire, ENGLAND () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
