On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:21:27 +0200 Sascha Wildner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 23.04.2010 09:19, schrieb Colin Adams: > > I thought I had previously seen (on this mailing list) advice that > > hammer was designed for use on 500GB systems or bigger. Accordingly, as > > I only have a 160GB drive, I am not using it. > > > > But just now (after reading some of today's messages), I took a look at > > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/ to learn more about hammer. There is > > says it is designed to be used on 50GB or more. So was I misreading > > earlier, or have improvements meant it is now practical for smaller file > > systems? > > 50MB is what we recommend officially, thought people also have run it on er 50GB > smaller disks. > > The 500 you read surely was a typo. as was that M ;) -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
