On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Dillon <dil...@apollo.backplane.com> wrote: > Hello everyone! First, I apologize for the aborted 2.12 release. We > got as far as rolling it but I decided to make a real push to try to > fix the occassional random seg-fault bug that we were still seeing > on 64-bit at the time.
The 2011Q4 release is due out in 6 days, so we've got a nice time window for releasing. As for 3.0, as Samuel says, it would be be nice to have a new technology to talk up with the version number. I like all the changes since the 2.10 release, but they are hard to quantify in a user-apparent way. The question that I think follows is: how soon can we have a (even marked as dangerously beta) Hammer 2 or something similar? 2.0 had Hammer, so it would be nice to have 3.0 with Hammer 2, even with big warning stickers all over it. If it's 9 months out, then there's no point in waiting that long. I realize I'm volunteering other people's schedules by asking that.
