Dne pà 11. Ãnora 2005 07:59 Hynek Vychodil napsal(a): > > To samozÅejmÄ znÃm, ale ... > > TÃm hÅÅ. S tÄmi co nedodrÅujà standardy mÃme svà zkuÅenosti.
A co tÅeba nÄco takovÃho? http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.0.1/LSB-Core/LSB-Core/swinstall.html Applications shall either be packaged in the RPM packaging format as defined in this specification, or supply an installer which is LSB conforming (for example, calls LSB commands and utilities). [1] Distributions shall provide a mechanism for installing applications in this packaging format with some restrictions listed below. [2] [1] Supplying an RPM format package is encouraged because it makes systems easier to manage. A future version of the LSB may require RPM, or specify a way for an installer to update a package database. Applications are also encouraged to uninstall cleanly. [2] The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its own packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for installing the LSB-conformant packages. KaÅdopÃdnÄ pÅÃt se mÅÅeme do nekoneÄna, takÅe konÄÃm, poslednà pÅÃspÄvek do vlÃkna ... -- Robert Vojta NavÅtivte nÃÅ novà portÃl http://www.OpenOffice.cz/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
