On May 14, 2008, at 11:53 AM, ajweav wrote:


Well AXIS supports JAX-RPC, so I could use that in lieu of CXF for now.


Technically, Axis 1 supports JAX-RPC.   Axis 2 does not.


Also:

1.) (I know this isnt a BEA board), but does that mean I'd have issues with inter-op as well (calling BEA WS from a .Net client)? I cant seem to get that working either, but since you seem to have knowledge of BEA, I thought
Id through it out to you...

2.) to make this second post a CXF user board qualifying post, have there been inter-op issues calling .Net service (pre-WCF) since I believe they are
RPC as well?

All of that really depends. Some of the older toolkits from MS did support the "wrapped doc/lit" stuff which would work with the modern toolkits as well. I'm definitely not a MS person so I'm not familiar with all the details, but if you can get your services using the wrapped doc/lit stuff, you're definitely much better off. Most of the older JAX-RPC toolkits also supported the wrapped doc/lit stuff as well. The BEA stuff might. I don't really know.

Dan





Thanks
AJ




Glen Mazza-2 wrote:

2008-05-14 ajweav wrote:

I am looking for a post on using CXF to generate stub code and connect to
a
secure (x509) service.

I am trying to do the same thing now with a Weblogic web service (but who cares if its weblogic really, for all intents and purposes, its some web
service in a cloud with an x509 cert auth requirement)


Not necessarily unfortunately--as far as its security features go, BEA
WebLogic is a JAX-RPC implementation (read caution at the tops of [1]
and [2]), while CXF is JAX-WS, so YMMV. We are grappling with that at
work right now, and I unfortunately don't have any answers yet.

Glen

[1] http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs100/webserv/setenv.html
[2] http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs100/webserv/jaxws.html





--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Java-client-using-CXF-to-call-x509-secure-Wservice-tp17232021p17234455.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog




Reply via email to