Sergey,

> you should probaly change it to setSecurityContext().

It doesn't work.
 
> Having a given @Context-annotated field of type SecurityContext 
> should also work - it's not thread safe though at the moment.
> Shortly, the following form of injection will also be supported :
> 
> @Context
> void setSecurityContext(SecurityContext sc) {}

That doesn't work either due to a compile error:

annotation type not applicable to this kind of declaration
    [javac]    @Context
    [javac]     ^
    [javac] 1 error

Are you absolutely sure this setter logic will work through a REST call? I 
haven't tried a WS call yet, I'd like one solution for both types of 
service.


John

> About ServletContext : only @Resource annotated field of this type 
> can be injected. @Context annotated fields of this type (and
> setters and parameters) will also be supported shortly.
> 
> Cheers, Sergey
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Sergey,
> >
> > To confirm, if I remove the Webservice configuration and annotate a
> > parameter to a method, the SecurityContext is set as expected.
> >
> > So what i'm looking for is a solution for a bean exposed through WS 
and
> > REST, and given we can't expose a bean through a WS when a method has 
been
> > annotated, a setter seems the only way forward  -  but that currently
> > doesn't work.
> >
> >
> > John Baker
> > -- 
> > Web SSO
> > IT Infrastructure
> > Deutsche Bank London
> >
> > URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John-M Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 23/06/2008 12:08
> > Please respond to
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > To
> > [email protected]
> > cc
> > [email protected]
> > Subject
> > Re: Roles and permissions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sergey,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback, and congratulations on the new 2.1.1. 
release of
> >
> > CXF.  I'm using this release I can not get access to the 
ServletContext or
> >
> > SecurityContext within a bean when called via REST.  Here's what I've
> > added:
> >
> > private ServletContext sc;
> >
> > public void setServletContext(@Context  ServletContext sc)
> > { this.sc = sc; }
> >
> > and
> >
> > private SecurityContext sc;
> >
> > public void setServletContext(@Context  SecurityContext sc)
> > { this.sc = sc; }
> >
> > sc is null in both cases when a REST call is made.  Are more 
annotations
> > required?
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> > John Baker
> > -- 
> > Web SSO
> > IT Infrastructure
> > Deutsche Bank London
> >
> > URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Sergey Beryozkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 23/06/2008 11:20
> > Please respond to
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > To
> > <[email protected]>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: Roles and permissions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, I don't remember offhand how, have a look at the JAX-WS docs 
please,
> > I think it can be injected through a field or through a
> > setter. Perhaps using a setter is better in cases like this, as you 
can
> > then extract the common info from either JAX-WS
> > WebServiceContext or JAX-RS SecurityContext.
> >
> > Perhaps, in the future, things like SecurityContext in both JAX-WS and
> > JAX-RS can rely on some shared (CXF utility) code so that
> > they can be casted to a common class to be used by the application...
> >
> > Cheers, Sergey
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John-M Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: Roles and permissions
> >
> >
> >> And how is that done?  Via a set method of some kind?
> >>
> >> John Baker
> >> -- 
> >> Web SSO
> >> IT Infrastructure
> >> Deutsche Bank London
> >>
> >> URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> 20/06/2008 18:13
> >> Please respond to
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >> To
> >> [email protected]
> >> cc
> >>
> >> Subject
> >> Re: Roles and permissions
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:23 AM, John-M Baker wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> What was the solution to this problem?  Only apply it to the REST
> >>> service?
> >>> Will a future release of CXF fix it for SOAP?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, JAX-WS has it's own security stuff.    Thus, for jax-ws/soap,
> >> you would need the WebServiceContext injected which has the 
principal/
> >> role on it.
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >
> > ----------------------------
> > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> > Registered Number: 171387
> > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, 
Ireland
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If 
you
> > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
> > please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
> > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in 
this
> > e-mail is strictly forbidden.
> >
> > Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
> > additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received 
this
> > e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete 
> this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution
> > of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
> >
> > Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm 
> for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> 
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, 
Ireland


---

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, 
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional 
EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.

Reply via email to