Dan,

I have done this:

   /**
    * Retrieve an application configuration by id.
    * 
    * Webservice method.
    */
   Response getApplicationConfiguration(@PathParam("id") String id);
 
   /**
    * Retrieve an application configuration by id.
    * 
    * REST method.
    */
   @GET
   @Path("/get/{id}/")
   @ProduceMime("application/xml")
   @WebMethod(exclude = true)
   Response getApplicationConfiguration(@PathParam("id") String id, 
         @Context SecurityContext sc);
 
And in the implementation, the former calls the latter passing the global 
variable set from the setter method - which currently does not work. Which 
brings me back to the question on a timeline for when the setter method 
solution will work?

Also, I see weblogic's WS implementation has a concept of permissioning as 
follows:

    @RolesAllowed([EMAIL PROTECTED](role=AUTHORIZE)})
    public boolean authorize(AuthorizeRequest request) {

Would this be something CXF may support?  Annotating methods with roles 
does seem a nice feature.  I was just about to read the jax-ws 
specificaiton to see if it mentioned this approach, but I'm sure you guys 
have a better idea!



John Baker
-- 
Web SSO 
IT Infrastructure 
Deutsche Bank London

URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com




Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
23/06/2008 15:29
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: Roles and permissions







You probably will need to split it into two methods, one that takes 
the JAX-RS SecurityContext and one that doesn't and instead uses the 
WebServiceContext.    Probably the two of those would just pull the 
required stuff out and pass them to a common third method that's only 
in the impl, not the interface.

Dan


On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:22 AM, John-M Baker wrote:

> Yes!!  Sorry, I missed this completely.
>
> Therefore shall I conclude there's no way of getting a 
> SecurityContext for
> a WS call until a future release of CXF?
>
>
> John Baker
> -- 
> Web SSO
> IT Infrastructure
> Deutsche Bank London
>
> URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
>
>
>
>
> "Sergey Beryozkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 23/06/2008 15:13
> Please respond to
> [email protected]
>
>
> To
> <[email protected]>
> cc
> <[email protected]>
> Subject
> Re: Roles and permissions
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>> *********Shortly, the following form of injection will also be
> supported***** :
>
> Does it answer your question ?
>
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>>>
>>> @Context
>>> void setSecurityContext(SecurityContext sc) {}
>>
>> That doesn't work either due to a compile error:
>>
>> annotation type not applicable to this kind of declaration
>>   [javac]    @Context
>>   [javac]     ^
>>   [javac] 1 error
>>
>> Are you absolutely sure this setter logic will work through a REST 
>> call?
> I
>> haven't tried a WS call yet, I'd like one solution for both types of
>> service.
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>> About ServletContext : only @Resource annotated field of this type
>>> can be injected. @Context annotated fields of this type (and
>>> setters and parameters) will also be supported shortly.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sergey,
>>>>
>>>> To confirm, if I remove the Webservice configuration and annotate a
>>>> parameter to a method, the SecurityContext is set as expected.
>>>>
>>>> So what i'm looking for is a solution for a bean exposed through WS
>> and
>>>> REST, and given we can't expose a bean through a WS when a method 
>>>> has
>> been
>>>> annotated, a setter seems the only way forward  -  but that 
>>>> currently
>>>> doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Baker
>>>> -- 
>>>> Web SSO
>>>> IT Infrastructure
>>>> Deutsche Bank London
>>>>
>>>> URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John-M Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> 23/06/2008 12:08
>>>> Please respond to
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> cc
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> Subject
>>>> Re: Roles and permissions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sergey,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your feedback, and congratulations on the new 2.1.1.
>> release of
>>>>
>>>> CXF.  I'm using this release I can not get access to the
>> ServletContext or
>>>>
>>>> SecurityContext within a bean when called via REST.  Here's what 
>>>> I've
>>>> added:
>>>>
>>>> private ServletContext sc;
>>>>
>>>> public void setServletContext(@Context  ServletContext sc)
>>>> { this.sc = sc; }
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> private SecurityContext sc;
>>>>
>>>> public void setServletContext(@Context  SecurityContext sc)
>>>> { this.sc = sc; }
>>>>
>>>> sc is null in both cases when a REST call is made.  Are more
>> annotations
>>>> required?
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Baker
>>>> -- 
>>>> Web SSO
>>>> IT Infrastructure
>>>> Deutsche Bank London
>>>>
>>>> URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sergey Beryozkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> 23/06/2008 11:20
>>>> Please respond to
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> cc
>>>>
>>>> Subject
>>>> Re: Roles and permissions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I don't remember offhand how, have a look at the JAX-WS docs
>> please,
>>>> I think it can be injected through a field or through a
>>>> setter. Perhaps using a setter is better in cases like this, as you
>> can
>>>> then extract the common info from either JAX-WS
>>>> WebServiceContext or JAX-RS SecurityContext.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps, in the future, things like SecurityContext in both JAX-WS
> and
>>>> JAX-RS can rely on some shared (CXF utility) code so that
>>>> they can be casted to a common class to be used by the 
>>>> application...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "John-M Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:36 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Roles and permissions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> And how is that done?  Via a set method of some kind?
>>>>>
>>>>> John Baker
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Web SSO
>>>>> IT Infrastructure
>>>>> Deutsche Bank London
>>>>>
>>>>> URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> 20/06/2008 18:13
>>>>> Please respond to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> cc
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject
>>>>> Re: Roles and permissions
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:23 AM, John-M Baker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What was the solution to this problem?  Only apply it to the REST
>>>>>> service?
>>>>>> Will a future release of CXF fix it for SOAP?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, JAX-WS has it's own security stuff.    Thus, for jax-ws/ 
>>>>> soap,
>>>>> you would need the WebServiceContext injected which has the
>> principal/
>>>>> role on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------
>>>> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
>>>> Registered Number: 171387
>>>> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
>> Ireland
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
> If
>> you
>>>> are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
> error)
>>>> please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
>>>> unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
>> this
>>>> e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>>>>
>>>> Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
>>>> additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged
>>> information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received
>> this
>>>> e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete
>>> this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution
>>>> of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>>>>
>>>> Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm
>>> for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------
>>> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
>>> Registered Number: 171387
>>> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
>> Ireland
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
>> If
> you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
>> e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this
> e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution
>> of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>>
>> Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
> additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, 
> Ireland
>
>
>
> ---
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
> If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail 
> in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e- 
> mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the 
> material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>
> Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for 
> additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.

---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog







---

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, 
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional 
EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.

Reply via email to