Are you sure that the X509 token profile defines encryption of any MIME attachments used by MTOM? Otherwise I could imagine MTOM using the within-the-soap-body X64 binary instead so it can be encrypted as normal.
Mayank Mishra-3 wrote: > > Hi Maciej, > > Combination of MTOM and WS-Security must work. There is nothing like > mutually exclusive. AFAIK, securing MTOM attachment is not supported > currently. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MTOM-%2B-WS-Security-X.509-Certificate-Token-Profile-Question-tp22333460p22335744.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
