Glen Mazza wrote:
Are you sure that the X509 token profile defines encryption of any MIME
attachments used by MTOM? Otherwise I could imagine MTOM using the
within-the-soap-body X64 binary instead so it can be encrypted as normal.
Glen,
No, X509 token profile doesn't define anything about securing MIME
attachments. I was refering to the case where one MIME part having
soap-body with secured data and other MIME part having binary attachment.
With Regards,
Mayank
Mayank Mishra-3 wrote:
Hi Maciej,
Combination of MTOM and WS-Security must work. There is nothing like
mutually exclusive. AFAIK, securing MTOM attachment is not supported
currently.
