Eoghan Glynn wrote:
2009/3/19 Bryan Kearney <[email protected]>
Question.. is it valid semantics to use WSRM and One Way messages?
Yes, as long the client-side is configured to use a non-anonymous decoupled
response endpoint.
If you're only sending oneways, this may seem a bit counter-intuitive ..
i.e. why do I need a decoupled repsonse endpoint if there are no responses,
surely the wsa:Reply would be set to none in that case?
The answer is that the decoupled endpoint is required to receive *deferred
acknowledgements*. So this endpoint is advertized via the wsrm:AcksTo as
opposed to the wsa:ReplyTo.
Cheers,
Eoghan
Well.. at least both my threads are about me being stupid about the same
thing! Looking at the users guide
(http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/index.html) I do not see anything
about decoupled endpoint. Do you have an example on the website?
-- bk
