> Do you have an example on the website? Have a look at the ws_rm sample, particularly the client-side config:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_rm/src/demo/ws_rm/client/ws_rm.xml?view=markup Cheers, Eoghan 2009/3/19 Bryan Kearney <[email protected]> > Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >> 2009/3/19 Bryan Kearney <[email protected]> >> >>> Question.. is it valid semantics to use WSRM and One Way messages? >>> >> >> >> Yes, as long the client-side is configured to use a non-anonymous >> decoupled >> response endpoint. >> >> If you're only sending oneways, this may seem a bit counter-intuitive .. >> i.e. why do I need a decoupled repsonse endpoint if there are no >> responses, >> surely the wsa:Reply would be set to none in that case? >> >> The answer is that the decoupled endpoint is required to receive *deferred >> acknowledgements*. So this endpoint is advertized via the wsrm:AcksTo as >> opposed to the wsa:ReplyTo. >> >> Cheers, >> Eoghan >> >> Well.. at least both my threads are about me being stupid about the same > thing! Looking at the users guide ( > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/index.html) I do not see anything about > decoupled endpoint. Do you have an example on the website? > > -- bk > > > >
