Hi Josh, I've just committed a further fix for this. I've also added a Declarative Services demo to the samples directory ( http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/trunk/samples/ds ) which can be used to play with this stuff. I tested it with the DS implementation that comes with Equinox 3.5M6.
One thing to note when using DS... There is a subtle difference between the following two lines: (1) <property name="myKey">myVal</property> (2) <property name="myKey" value="myVal" /> In (1) myVal is stored in a String [] on the service registration while in (2) myVal is stored as a simple String. In CXF/DOSGi some of the properties are expected to be of type String, so in some cases syntax (2) is required, e.g the following works for me: <property name="osgi.remote.interfaces">*</property> <property name="osgi.remote.configuration.type" value="pojo" /> <property name="osgi.remote.configuration.pojo.address" value="http://localhost:9090/adder"; /> I've marked bug 2173 as fixed, please close if it works for you too. Cheers, David 2009/5/19 David Bosschaert <[email protected]>: > Thanks Josh. I've reopened the issue and will investigate further. > > David > > 2009/5/19 Josh Holtzman <[email protected]>: >> Great, thanks David. I was pretty sure my patch was wrong, and I appreciate >> you taking the time to do this correctly. Unfortunately, I'm still having >> trouble getting declarative services to work. I'll post more details to the >> Jira ticket itself. >> >> Thanks, >> Josh >> >> >> >> >> David Bosschaert wrote: >>> >>> Hi Josh, >>> >>> Just to let you know that I committed a fix for this. Please close the >>> bug if it works for you. >>> >>> David >>> >>> 2009/5/11 Josh Holtzman <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> >>>> Great, thanks David! >>>> >>>> Josh >>>> >>>> David Bosschaert wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Josh, >>>>> >>>>> An email like this one is great - thanks! I didn't spot your patch >>>>> before. I will have a look as soon as possible, hopefully sometime >>>>> this week. In the mean time I've assigned the bug to myself so I won't >>>>> forget about it :) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> 2009/5/11 Josh Holtzman <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've got a procedural question regarding submission of patches. Last >>>>>> week I >>>>>> attached a patch to address CXF-2173, but there has been no discussion >>>>>> on >>>>>> that issue in Jira and the bug remains unassigned. Should I have sent >>>>>> an >>>>>> email to the users list asking for review of the patch? Should I just >>>>>> be >>>>>> more patient and wait until a committer picks up the issue? I don't >>>>>> want >>>>>> to >>>>>> be pushy... I'm just wondering what happens next. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Josh >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Josh Holtzman >>>>>> Educational Technology Services, UC Berkeley >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> 510.529.9225 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Josh Holtzman >>>> Educational Technology Services, UC Berkeley >>>> [email protected] >>>> 510.529.9225 >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Josh Holtzman >> Educational Technology Services, UC Berkeley >> [email protected] >> 510.529.9225 >> >> >
