thanks for your response andrew, so i must put my 500 code in a SAUP Fault with my message? Is that right? Do you know the easiest way to add SAUP faults to a webservice wsdl-first?
Andrew Clegg-2 wrote: > > I don't think so -- this is well outside normal SOAP behaviour. Errors > should be reported as SOAP Faults sent back in a normal SOAP envelope, > otherwise clients won't handle them correctly. > > There may be a way to hack this behaviour (someone from the CXF team > might know) but I'd highly recommend against doing so. > > Remember as well that SOAP is transport-independent -- SOAP services > can't assume they're running on HTTP, it might be JMS or direct TCP or > even an email :-) > > Andrew. > > 2009/6/24 tutu <[email protected]>: >> >> SOAP web services >> >> tutu wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Does anybody know if cxf web service can return HTTP exceptions with >>> configurable messages? >>> In other words, does a web service can return HTTP 500: application >>> error/ >>> database problem? >>> >>> thanks in advance, >>> >>> tugdual >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Does-CXF-web-service-can-return-HTTP-exceptions--tp24180699p24181305.html >> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > :: http://biotext.org.uk/ :: > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Does-CXF-web-service-can-return-HTTP-exceptions--tp24180699p24181508.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
