Your original message contained the XSD fragment from the enum, from Aegis,
that confounded MS. I need to compare it to the corresponding fragment from
JAXB that didn't.



On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:37 AM, skuramshin
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Thank you for responding!
>
>
> bimargulies wrote:
> >
> > to help you with this, I have to ask you to provide two XSD fragments:
> > Aegis
> > and Other.
> >
>
> I'm not using any custom XSD schemas at all...
>
> The service is defined in the Spring configuration. With Aegis databinding:
>
>    <jaxws:endpoint id="testService-ws"
>        implementor="#testService-remote" address="/testService">
>        <jaxws:dataBinding>
>            <ref bean="aegisTestDataBinding" />
>        </jaxws:dataBinding>
>    </jaxws:endpoint>
>
>    <bean id="aegisTestDataBinding"
> class="org.apache.cxf.aegis.databinding.AegisDatabinding"
>        scope="prototype">
>    </bean>
>
> Without Aegis:
>
>    <jaxws:endpoint id="testService-ws"
>        implementor="#testService-remote" address="/testService">
>    </jaxws:endpoint>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Aegis-databinding----Duplicate-C--proxy-classes-generated-for-Java-classes-tp25573591p25610518.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to