bimargulies wrote:
>
> Your original message contained the XSD fragment from the enum, from
> Aegis,
> that confounded MS. I need to compare it to the corresponding fragment
> from
> JAXB that didn't.
>
I had this thought as well... the WSDL definition for the enum is exactly
the same, with and without Aegis:
<xsd:simpleType name="SqlDialect">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="GENERIC" />
<xsd:enumeration value="SYBASE" />
<xsd:enumeration value="SQL_SERVER" />
<xsd:enumeration value="ORACLE" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Aegis-databinding----Duplicate-C--proxy-classes-generated-for-Java-classes-tp25573591p25611511.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
